Below is my evaluation which I have published on Issuu.
Portfolio Section
- 1a. Research (Films) (12)
- 1b. Research (Trailers and Audience) (8)
- 2. Planning (5)
- 3a. Main Product (6)
- 3b. Ancillary Products (8)
- 4. Evaluation (5)
Monday, 29 April 2013
Friday, 26 April 2013
Analysis Of My Magazine Cover
Click on the link below the image to take you to Flickr where you can hover over my magazine cover to view my analysis of it.
Thursday, 25 April 2013
Final Cut Of Our Trailer: Blank
Here is the final cut of our trailer. I have also added an alternative cut of our trailer on a separate post. This is because we aren't so keen on the soundtrack in this cut but prefer when Blank is on screen as we have taken out the "wobbly" effect.
Alternative Cut Of Trailer: Blank
Here is an alternative final cut of our trailer. This differs from our final cut by having the "wobbly" effect when Blank appears on screen. We prefer the soundtrack from this as it included less of the teddy bear lyrics and overall sounds more creepy and contrapuntel.
Focus Group Video Screening
Here is the video from our final focus group screening. The comments that were made afterwards can be viewed on a separate post.
Feedback From Final Screening
We asked our class what they liked after seeing our final screening of Blank and this is what they said:
Soundtrack was good x6
Jump scare at the end worked well
Jumps throughout were good x2
Camera angles- close-ups and canted angles x2
The wobble effect when blank shows up x3
Wide variety of shots
Heartbeat pulse works well x3
Inter-title font looks good x3
The music changes were great – real horror feel
Sound effects were really well done
Collision cuts were awesome
Really cool villain x2
We then asked what needs to be improved and here was the response:
More horror conventions needed x3
Didn’t like the inter-title text font
Lack of low key lighting x3
Slender in the road – didn’t really make sense
Voices are too quiet x3
Dialogue is too quick
Don’t understand plot of going to the woods – not enough narrative to explain – more inter-titles needed x 2
Would have worked better at night
The blurry effect doesn’t work so well
Real Magazine Cover Analysis
Click on the link below the image to take you to Flickr where you can view my analysis of the real magazine cover.
Favourite Image Analysis
I have
chosen this as my favourite image analysis because it embodies the genre of
psychological horror in one single screenshot. It is taken from The Woman In Black (2012)
directed by James Watkins. The main male character, Arthur Kipps, presses his
hand against the misty window and looks into the foggy marshland conforming to
the typical horror conventions of having a creepy location. There is no
dialogue and no other diegetic sounds so the audience are left in suspense,
wondering what is going to happen. After a few eerie seconds of silence, the face of
the woman in black suddenly appears at the window and then disappears just as
quickly forcing Arthur to shudder his hand away in shock. As the woman's face
appears, there is a momentary burst of non-diegetic sound; a combination of
instruments to form a medium pitched screech.
This is the first real scene of us seeing
the woman in black up close, even if it is just momentarily, so as an
unsuspecting audience, this shocks us causing us to jump as well as the
character himself. Her face is only apparent at the window for just over a
second, but this quick montage shot is long enough for the target demographic
of psychological horror films to gain a clear image of the dreaded woman in
back. We see her withered, colourless face with her long, scraggly black hair
giving us a chilling sensation as we feel a sense of fear of her. The use of
make-up cleverly makes the woman in black look old and haggard and gives the
desired effect of being frightening.
The end result is that this clearly
establishes her as the unconventional psycho/serial killer, fitting an
archetype often found in psychological horror films.
Wednesday, 24 April 2013
Analysis Of My Poster
Click on the link below the image to take you to Flickr where you can hover over my poster to view my analysis of it.
Final Cut Of Our Trailer: Blank
Here is the final cut of our trailer. I have also added an alternative cut of our trailer on a separate post. This is because we aren't so keen on the soundtrack in this cut but prefer when Blank is on screen as we have taken out the "wobbly" effect.
Alternative Cut Of Trailer: Blank
Here is an alternative final cut of our trailer. This differs from our final cut by having the "wobbly" effect when Blank appears on screen. We prefer the soundtrack from this as it included less of the teddy bear lyrics and overall sounds more creepy and contrapuntel.
Focus Group Video Screening
Here is the video from our focus group screening. The comments that were made afterwards can be viewed on a separate post.
Feedback From Final Screening
We asked our class what they liked after seeing our final screening of
Blank and this is what they said:
Soundtrack was good x6
Jump scare at the end worked well
Jumps throughout were good x2
Camera angles- close-ups and canted angles x2
The wobble effect when blank shows up x3
Wide variety of shots
Heartbeat pulse works well x3
Inter-title font looks good x3
The music changes were great – real horror feel
Sound effects were really well done
Collision cuts were awesome
Really cool villain x2
We then asked what needs to be improved and here was the response:
More horror conventions needed x3
Didn’t like the inter-title text font
Lack of low key lighting x3
Slender in the road – didn’t really make sense
Voices are too quiet x3
Dialogue is too quick
Don’t understand plot of going to the woods – not enough narrative to
explain – more inter-titles needed x 2
Would have worked better at night
The blurry effect doesn’t work so well
Here are the scores we received:
10, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9, 8, 8, 7, 7, 7, 6
The average score was = 8.17
DOTD (2004) First Image Analysis
This still image is from the opening credits. It shows a scene of a
mosque with lots of people kneeling down and praying. It is filmed on what
looks like a video phone as if it is a news report from a Middle Eastern
country. The tragedy of 9/11 was still fresh in everybody’s mind because it was
filmed in 2004, so historical context plays an important role in the film and
especially the opening few minutes. We see short flashes of zombies attacking
and we also see the White House being ambushed with what we presume are the
zombies. This is suggesting that the virus which causes the zombies to form,
originated from the Middle East as this is where the bombers of 9/11 came from.
The soundtrack to accompany the opening is “Man comes around” by Johnny
Cash. The tune is seemingly contrapuntal but the lyrics cleverly relate to
biblical Armageddon of how the dead are rising to come and punish the sinners. "And I heard a voice in the midst of the
four beasts. And I looked, and behold a pale horse, and his name that sat on him
was Death, and hell followed with him." These
lyrics are an example of the biblical references to the dead. The soundtrack
also links to the original DOTD (1979)
as its tagline is “When there’s no more room in hell, the dead will walk the
earth.” This connotes that there are too many sinners in hell so they have come
back as zombies to walk the earth. It shows that the director, Zack Snyder,
respects the original DOTD (1979)
and wanted to include some of its core aspects in his version of it.
Tuesday, 23 April 2013
DOTD (2004) Second Image Analysis
This screenshot shows Ana attacking the vicious looking female zombie. It
clearly shows the amount of body horror included in the film. Since the
original Dawn of the Dead (1979)
was filmed, audiences have become more desensitised to blood and gore so they
expect more of it in a gory horror film nowadays than what would be expected in
the 70’s. Also, censorship is more relaxed now. To prove this, a lot of films
in the 70’s/80’s that were banned or cut are now out on DVD. For example, Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1973) and Evil
Dead (1981).
Compared to the original, there are many more deaths in this 2004 version
however they are shorter, sharper shocks as the modern day audience’s attention
spans are much shorter. This is done through cleverly edited sound effects and
restricted narration. The zombies in this are much more real looking and they
are a lot quicker than the original slow moving zombies in the original. They
are more realistic and are harder to escape but this is more suited to the
action-horror style. There are more zombies than the original and they are
constantly attacking, making it a faster paced film. We are completely
unsympathetic towards these zombies whereas in the 1979 version, Romero
reversed the character stereotypes so that we did feel sympathy for the
zombies. This film had a higher budget than the original and we see this impact
through the effects, the speed of the editing and the sheer amount of zombies
surrounding the mall.
DOTD (2004) Third Image Analysis
This image is one of the last shots
we see from Dawn Of The Dead
(2004). Here we have Ana, the final girl looking back from the boat to the
destruction they’ve escaped from. Ana is foreseen to have a tomboy, slightly
hardened personality. She is blonde, however has her hair tied back so suggests
she is not the stereotypical blonde, hopeless character normally seen in horror
films. Ana is a nurse and we clearly see this through her intelligence and
caring nature. She is also connoted as a tough character, proven when she
recovers well after the gruesome death of her husband at the beginning of the
film. She is very focussed on survival and can definitely fend for herself when
she confidently uses a gun to shoot Steve. Her intelligence is demonstrated
when she is the first to figure out that the bites spread the virus but her
kind heart appears when she is compassionate about Frank and the situation. She
is an authoritative figure and the voice of reason when she cleverly stands up
to Michael, Steve and Kenneth. In comparison to Fran in the original DOTD (1979), Ana is a lot
tougher, for example when she is threatened with a gun she exclaims “Get that
gun out of my face” whereas Fran would not have had the backbone to defend
herself so assuredly.
Since 1979 there has been a big rise in feminism and horror embraces the strength of women by having positive, strong female leading characters, such as Ripley in Alien (1979). The horror genre is very forward-thinking in terms of characterisation, strong women and black heroes would have not have been received so well in the 60’s and 70’s. In 1968 when Night Of The Living Dead was released in drive-in cinemas, the film was often greeted by racial abuse in the southern states of America. This image clearly has patriotic resemblance with the American flag in the foreground, showing that America is very proud of their country and Zack Snyder – the director – also wanted to show the brilliance of the country by placing many not so subtle iconic hints in throughout the film. It also connotes freedom and mainstream action horrors are very pro America. They often reflect the audience they are trying to attract showing the vital importance of historical context. Janet Staiger is a critic who obsessed over this and explains it in her book “Interpreting films” 1992.
Since 1979 there has been a big rise in feminism and horror embraces the strength of women by having positive, strong female leading characters, such as Ripley in Alien (1979). The horror genre is very forward-thinking in terms of characterisation, strong women and black heroes would have not have been received so well in the 60’s and 70’s. In 1968 when Night Of The Living Dead was released in drive-in cinemas, the film was often greeted by racial abuse in the southern states of America. This image clearly has patriotic resemblance with the American flag in the foreground, showing that America is very proud of their country and Zack Snyder – the director – also wanted to show the brilliance of the country by placing many not so subtle iconic hints in throughout the film. It also connotes freedom and mainstream action horrors are very pro America. They often reflect the audience they are trying to attract showing the vital importance of historical context. Janet Staiger is a critic who obsessed over this and explains it in her book “Interpreting films” 1992.
Wednesday, 3 April 2013
Real Poster Analysis
Click on the link below the image to take you to Flickr where you can view my analysis of the real poster.
Thursday, 28 March 2013
Sinister (2012) Trailer Review (Solo)
Name of film : Sinister
Year released : 2012
Genre of trailer : Mystery thriller
Your mark (after viewing) : 10/10
Which positive, clever or interesting aspects do you think you could include in your own trailer? What generic features are fulfilled well?
Which aspects of the trailer did you think were unsuccessful, and would put off its target audience? How is it disappointing?
Year released : 2012
Genre of trailer : Mystery thriller
Your mark (after viewing) : 10/10
What
happened in the trailer?
We are told that a family were murdered as the camera is showing us a house. 9 months later we see another family move to this same house. Whilst moving some boxes, the father finds some 8mm home movies in the attic from the family who had previously lived there. He watches them and forms the idea that it has something to do with a serial murder from the 60’s to which he later finds out are all linked by a symbol of a pagan deity who consumes the souls of children. We then see this pagan character in their swimming pool and the father then sees the figure in the woodland at the back of their house. The young girl in the family paints a picture on a wall of a little girl who used to live there. The father then finds his son in a cardboard box screaming as though he is possessed. Due to these terrifying events, the father then burns all the old home movies and orders his wife to get the kids and all get out of there. However they seem to be trapped in their own home as we see more paranormal affairs unfold including a group of dead-looking children sitting in the attic where the pagan deity then jumps straight in front of the camera to finish the trailer.
We are told that a family were murdered as the camera is showing us a house. 9 months later we see another family move to this same house. Whilst moving some boxes, the father finds some 8mm home movies in the attic from the family who had previously lived there. He watches them and forms the idea that it has something to do with a serial murder from the 60’s to which he later finds out are all linked by a symbol of a pagan deity who consumes the souls of children. We then see this pagan character in their swimming pool and the father then sees the figure in the woodland at the back of their house. The young girl in the family paints a picture on a wall of a little girl who used to live there. The father then finds his son in a cardboard box screaming as though he is possessed. Due to these terrifying events, the father then burns all the old home movies and orders his wife to get the kids and all get out of there. However they seem to be trapped in their own home as we see more paranormal affairs unfold including a group of dead-looking children sitting in the attic where the pagan deity then jumps straight in front of the camera to finish the trailer.
Which positive, clever or interesting aspects do you think you could include in your own trailer? What generic features are fulfilled well?
There
are many good jump scenes in this trailer. For example, at 1:23 when the father
hold up the picture of the woodland with the pagan character lurking in it,
then takes it down to reveal the killer standing in the exact same place. There
is a sudden burst of sound which makes the audience jump. They then make an
association between the scary sound and the pagan killer. The trailer sets the
narrative well and also distinguishes a well recognisable serial killer. It establishes
the plot well through good use of inter-title. The font is capitalised and easy
to read and fits well against the background used and the genre of the trailer.
There are some effective transitions used from shot to another such as the
flickering images at 1:48. This almost acts a flashback as we quickly see the
young girl who used to live in the house playing on their swing in the garden. This
adds a different technique of moving from one shot to another, other than a
fade or a straight cut.
Which aspects of the trailer did you think were unsuccessful, and would put off its target audience? How is it disappointing?
I have given this trailer a 10 out of
10 so there are no major aspects that I can complain about. However some may
say that children dying is too much of a sensitive subject but, for me, this
just feeds into the typical horror themes. I can see how, contextually, British
audiences may be unsettled by this due to the happenings of family deaths. For
example, the case of the Philpott’s in 2012 who burnt their house down in Derby
with their 6 children in it. From my standpoint, though, the director has
appealed to its target audience so if some viewers are put off by the main
subject then they have a choice not to watch it.
Wednesday, 27 March 2013
Tucker and Dale vs Evil (2010) Trailer Review (Solo)
Name
of film : Tucker
and Dale vs Evil
Year
released :
2010
Genre
of trailer
: Comedy
Your
mark (after viewing)
: 8/10
What
happened in the trailer?
In this redband trailer we see a
group of teenagers driving along the road in a truck when they are passed by
two men in another truck who look stereotypically like “hillbillies.” The group
of teenagers end up in the woods where they go skinny dipping during the
evening. One of the blonde characters falls in the lake which is also being
occupied by the two men who are fishing. They see her fall and drag her into their
boat to rescue her; however her on looking friends think they’ve captured her. The
two men take her to their cabin and look after her while she rests her injured
head. Her friends try to get her back but misunderstand the situation by
thinking she is digging her own grave when in fact she had offered to help them
dig a hole. Her friends end up killing themselves whilst attempting to save her
by running into branches, falling in the wood chopper and one even shoots themself.
The two men believe the group is on a suicide attack whereas the group think
the men are plotting to kill each of them off. The trailer ends with one of the
hillbilly’s laying on the floor with half a dead body on top of him, only to be
dragged off across his face by the other hillbilly.
Which
positive, clever or interesting aspects do you think you could include in your
own trailer? What generic features are fulfilled well?
The
trailer establishes the characters well; we know who is who and what role they
are playing in the film. Although, according to typical horror conventions, the
blonde female character should be the ditzy one who dies but in this trailer
the main blonde character appears to be independent and not worried about doing
psychical work. We do not know from the trailer if she survives until the end
but it is implied that she will. The trailer is comedic but with added gore which
will draw audiences in who like the comedy/gore hybrid genre of horror. The body
horror effects are realistic and believable which will entice the audience
further. I like the idea of making a comedy horror trailer but however feel it
is hard to tap into what makes a good comedy piece so will probably venture
away from this genre.
Which
aspects of the trailer did you think were unsuccessful, and would put off its
target audience? How is it disappointing?
The Woman In Black (2012) Trailer Review (Solo)
Name of film : The Woman In Black
Year released : 2012
Genre of trailer : Psychological horror
Your mark (after viewing) : 9/10
What happened in the trailer?
The trailer begins with a male
character sitting staring gloomily out of the window. There is a man speaking
over the top saying “So, you’re from London, trying to sell Eel Marsh House”
whilst we see the outside of an old looking house, assuming it is the house
that is being spoken about. We see various images of the marsh land surrounding
the house along with the character travelling towards it on a horse and cart. There
is a non-diegetic sound of a piano playing along with a diegetic sound of a
creaking noise when the character opens the door of the house. We see him
explore the house and find him looking through an old fashioned zoetrope. The first
jump moment happens here as he sees a woman’s face for a split second through
the gaps of the zoetrope. There is a screeching noise to accompany it making
the audience jump. There is then a quick montage of shots where we see a house
on fire in the village and the main character explaining that he can’t leave
yet even though people are continuously warning him to. We see children walking
through the marsh whilst the character watches on. There is use of pathetic
fallacy here as it is a stormy night which is then reflected in the character’s
face and mood. We then see him carrying his son, it then cuts to him ripping off
wallpaper to reveal the words “you could have saved him” so we presume it means
his son. There is then another quick
montage of shots inside Eel Marsh House showing the frantic and worried main
character. The main title appears on screen and the trailer ends with the main
character placing his hand on a misted up window to get a shock when a
screaming woman’s face appears on the other side.
Which positive, clever or interesting aspects do you think you could include in your own trailer? What generic features are fulfilled well?
There were many positive aspects
in this trailer. For example it sets the narrative well through use of clear
and descriptive inter-titles. There are many jumps scenes which informs the
audience as to what genre of horror the film will be. The music and sounds effects
are used appropriately and work well in conjunction with the images they are
used with. The music builds as the trailer gets more frantic which causes
increasing tension for the audience and makes them feel on edge. There are many
typical horror conventions used including plenty of low key lighting throughout
and a creepy location being Eel Marsh House. There are also plenty of close-ups
and great quick montages used to emphasize the drama.
Which
aspects of the trailer did you think were unsuccessful, and would put off its
target audience? How is it disappointing?
Year released : 2012
Genre of trailer : Psychological horror
Your mark (after viewing) : 9/10
Which positive, clever or interesting aspects do you think you could include in your own trailer? What generic features are fulfilled well?
I
found it hard to pick out any major aspects of this trailer that were
unsuccessful as it fulfilled many typical horror conventions and left me
feeling on edge but wanting to see more. Nevertheless there were perhaps
slightly too many jumps as it gave a lot away in terms of the plot so the
audience may be left underwhelmed by the full film.
Mood Board
Click on the link below the image to take you to Flickr where you can hover over the image and view the analysis.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/94397512@N03/8595506094/in/photostream
Feedback From Rough Cut
Here is the feedback we received from the class in our focus group screening of our rough cut trailer. The "x2" (for example) shows how many people said the same thing.
The scores we received are :
7/10 – 4 people
8/10 – 6 people
9/10 – 3 people
7/10 – 4 people
8/10 – 6 people
9/10 – 3 people
What did you like about the
trailer?
Soundtrack worked really well all the way through x4
Nice use of collision
cutting
Good
screeches when slender is present x2
The sound effects work well (sets a creepy tone), especially heartbeat in background x3
Cool fades
Cool props –
notes in the woodCool fades
The evil thing is really good! Looks really scary and believable
The end few shots are great x2
Had good jumps at various points x4
Camera angles were good x3
Good shots, quick editing
Really like the sound track mixed with horror style noises x4
Good shots where the car runs over the faded man
Good costume x2
The establishing shot at beginning was good – pan/tracking x2
The narrative was well established
Inter-titles need work (different font, better wording) x5
More plot to fully understand the narrative, maybe more dialogue x3
Make the slender man ‘ghost’ more visible
The music didn’t work all the way through, used it too much x4
Lighting is quite high key, not scary enough x2
The bit just before ‘I can’t run’ the music is too happy
Needs to have more close ups of the monster
Needs an effect or something at the end
Night scene would be interesting
Not enough jumpy scenes
Fades at the start need to be less frequent/slower
Rough Cut Of Trailer : Blank
Here is our rough cut of our psychological horror trailer, Blank. From our focus group screening, we can now determine which aspects need changing to improve it.
Tuesday, 26 March 2013
DOTD (1979) First Image Analysis
This scene
from Dawn of The Dead (1979) demonstrates how inadequate Stephen is as
being a dominant male hero. He continuously shoots a zombie in the stomach,
failing to kill it. Roger walks up, pushes Stephen’s gun away and fires one
shot to the zombie’s head, killing the zombie straight away. The pushing away
of the gun is a phallic signal and shows Roger’s power over Stephen. Stephen then messes up again afterwards as he
attempts to shoot a zombie to save Roger, but misses and the bullet ends up
skimming past Peter instead. This scene shows the importance of Andrew Sarris’
auteur theory as George A. Romero’s influence is key as to why this scene is so
distinctive, with the short Roger having more power than the taller, more
attractive Stephen. Here we see
Romero’s auteur tendency to flip expectations of characters because in a standard
film, the good looking TV traffic reporter would be the hero. However in this
case, Stephen is an inadequate character and continues to be until his death in
the mall due to his greedy possessiveness (“It’s ours. We took it.”).
DOTD (1979) Second Image Analysis
This mise-en-scene from Dawn Of The Dead (1979) is another clear
example of Romero’s auteur style. This time, it reflects his obsession with
consumerism in the 1970s. He always attempts to link his films to the context
of the time, which in this case is the phenomenon of the opening of shopping malls.
Romero really focussed on this, exaggerated it, and then made it a clear aspect
of the film. This scene shows zombies aimlessly wandering around the mall; connoting
us and how we function as consumers in the real world. A quote from Peter
expresses this; “They’re us. That’s all.” Romero was a strong believer of
responding to his audience and their behaviours, which is in conjunction with
critic Janet Staiger’s “Audience Studies” who viewed audiences as the primary
way to analyse films. Romero powerfully responds to his audience by almost
attacking them in an attempt to get viewers in 1979 to acknowledge the fact
that consumerism perhaps isn’t as wonderful as they thought.
Romero’s thematic tendency to
heavily relate to historical context was seen as early as Night Of The
Living Dead (NOTD, 1968), his first zombie film. Racist attitudes were very
apparent in the 60’s in Southern America where NOTD was filmed; however
Romero was greatly against this so created a character of which we could feel
sympathy towards. The main character, Ben, was black and survived the zombies
onslaught the cabin. However, he eventually gets shot by the group of selfish
rednecks, implicating the point that the small minded rednecks were racist. Ben
is clearly the hero of the film and we are devastated by his death. This links
to what was happening in the late 60’s in the southern states of America. The
African-American Civil Rights Movement was at its peak so black people were
finally making a stand for themselves and fighting back against segregation and
racism. Romero demonstrated how he was all for black civil rights by having a
black character who survives until his untimely death at the hands of bigoted
“rednecks.”
DOTD (1979) Third Image Analysis
This screenshot is from the final
scene of Dawn Of The Dead (1979) in which we see Fran and Peter escape
and fly away from the zombie filled mall. Romero is half Cuban and hates racism
and once again his auteur style is shown by having a black character, Peter,
survive right through to the end. Fran is the other last remaining survivor and
she is one that changed positively throughout her experience with the zombies.
This challenges all horror conventions regarding characters as Romero has
killed off the two characters most likely to survive, Stephen and Roger, the
young, white male heroes. It shows Romero’s enlightened thinking when it came
to both race and feminism.
At the beginning of the film, Fran
is projected as being the stereotypical blonde female victim. She is no help to
Stephen when he is being attacked by a zombie in the hangar scene and is
paralysed by fear when confronted with her first zombie. However, Gaylen Ross
who plays Fran refused to scream at any point during the film and Romero’s
increasingly worked in strong aspects to her character. Fran is pregnant and is
told by the others to take it easy but nevertheless throughout the film, begins
to build herself up as a strong independent woman who is just as capable as the
male characters. She began to voice her fears when saying “What have we done to
ourselves?” and by the end, managed to look after Roger when he was sick,
learnt how to shoot a gun well and learnt how to fly the helicopter. She
becomes the female hero and final girl; something we would not expect from a
blonde female character in a genre that stereotypically portrays them as a
victim.
On the other hand, Peter had always
been the laid-back, cool character, for example, in the hangar scene, he bangs
the coffee machine and coffee comes out. He is also very good with a gun, makes
good decisions and is physically strong; shown when building a wall upstairs to
block off the entrance. He initially considers suicide but shows the mental
toughness to escape the zombies and survive with her.
While Romero challenges stereotypes
of characters, the ending is fairly stereotypical in terms of conventional
narrative structure. Fran and Peter are low on fuel which leaves the ending
open as we do not find out if they escape the country. It also finishes with an
unhappy ending as their friends have succumbed unwillingly to the zombies and
been killed. This follows the typical conventions of horror films which leaves
the audience with a memorable ending that makes them eager to know if the heroes
survive. This type of open ending is also shown in The Hills Have Eyes (2006)
where 3 people survive and we see they are being spied on so again at the
finale, making the audience unsettles whilst setting up a sequel.
Monday, 11 March 2013
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
















